Da Vinci Robotic Surgery Injuries: Legal Guide

When Surgical Robots Cause Harm

#

The da Vinci Surgical System revolutionized minimally invasive surgery. But behind the marketing promises of smaller incisions and faster recovery lies a troubling record: over 20,000 adverse events reported to the FDA, more than 2,000 documented injuries, at least 274 deaths, and 93+ active lawsuits against manufacturer Intuitive Surgical.

When these $2 million robotic systems malfunction—or when surgeons lack adequate training to operate them safely—patients pay the price. Burns from electrical current leaking through defective instruments. Perforated organs from robotic arms moving unpredictably. Deaths from complications that might have been prevented with traditional surgery.

The Da Vinci System

#

Market Dominance

#

Intuitive Surgical’s da Vinci system dominates robotic surgery:

• ~60% global market share in surgical robotics
• 9,500+ systems installed worldwide
• 2.5+ million procedures in 2024 alone (17% growth)
• Present in most major U.S. hospitals

Current Models:

• Da Vinci Xi (most common)
• Da Vinci X
• Da Vinci SP (single port)
• Da Vinci 5 (newest, already recalled)

How It Works

#

The da Vinci system has three main components:

Surgeon Console: The surgeon sits at a console viewing a 3D image of the surgical field, controlling robotic arms with hand and foot controls.

Patient Cart: Robotic arms with surgical instruments operate inside the patient through small incisions. Arms can rotate and bend beyond human hand capability.

Vision System: High-definition 3D cameras provide magnified views of the surgical field.

Common Procedures:

• Prostatectomy (prostate removal)
• Hysterectomy (uterus removal)
• Colectomy (colon surgery)
• Cardiac procedures
• Hernia repair
• Cancer surgery

FDA Adverse Event Data

#

The MAUDE Database

#

The FDA’s Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database tracks medical device problems. The da Vinci’s record is extensive:

14-Year Study (2000-2013):

Injury Rate: Approximately 83.4 incidents per 100,000 procedures—remaining constant over the study period.

Expanded Analysis (Through 2018):

• 20,000+ adverse events total
• 2,000+ injury reports (possibly 4,000+ due to batch reporting)
• 274 death reports
• 17,000+ device malfunctions

Underreporting Problems

#

The true scope of da Vinci injuries is likely much larger:

Batch Reporting: The FDA allowed Intuitive to combine multiple adverse events into single reports. NBC News found 12 instances where Intuitive batched events, including one filing combining 200 injuries into a single report. This could mean 4,000+ actual injury reports, not 2,000+.

FDA Warning Letter (2013): The FDA criticized Intuitive for:

• Failing to report many device malfunctions
• Failing to include cleaning instructions for robotic instruments
• Inadequate safety notification procedures

Voluntary Reporting: MAUDE relies on voluntary reports—researchers estimate it captures only a fraction of actual incidents.

Common Injuries and Complications

#

Electrical and Thermal Burns

#

The Problem: Da Vinci instruments use electrosurgical energy that can leak to unintended areas. In 2011, University of Western Ontario researchers tested 37 da Vinci instruments and found all 37 had “energy leakage”—some sufficient to cause electrical burns.

How It Happens:

• Cracks or slits in rubber tip covers allow electricity to escape
• Surgeons can’t see or feel the current leaking
• Internal burns may not be immediately apparent
• Bowel burns can lead to perforation, sepsis, death

2024 Wrongful Death Case: Sandra Sultzer underwent da Vinci-assisted colon cancer surgery in September 2021. The robot allegedly burned and perforated her small intestine. She developed abdominal pain and fever, required additional surgeries, and died in February 2022. Her husband’s lawsuit alleges Intuitive knew about insulation problems but didn’t disclose the risk.

Organ Perforation and Laceration

#

Types of Injuries:

• Bowel perforation (small intestine, colon)
• Bladder perforation
• Ureteral injury (tubes connecting kidneys to bladder)
• Vascular injury (blood vessel damage)
• Nerve damage

Why It Happens:

• Robotic arms operate with significant force
• 3D visualization can create depth perception errors
• Thermal spread from electrosurgical instruments
• Uncontrolled or unexpected arm movements

Delayed Recognition: Many perforations aren’t recognized during surgery. Patients develop symptoms—pain, fever, sepsis—hours or days later, when the injury is harder to treat and more likely to be fatal.

Instrument Malfunctions

#

Common Problems:

• Broken pieces falling into patient’s body
• Instruments not responding to surgeon commands
• Graspers not releasing tissue properly
• Camera failures obscuring surgical field
• Complete system shutdowns mid-surgery

186 Recalls Since 2005: Intuitive has issued at least 186 recalls and safety notices, including:

March 2024: Da Vinci 5 recalled for foot pedal spring failures causing pedals to become stuck

2024: Da Vinci 5 Endowrist Vessel Sealer Extend recalled for insufficient sealing potential

Extended Surgical Times and Conversion

#

The Delay Problem: When da Vinci systems malfunction mid-surgery, surgeons must troubleshoot while the patient remains under anesthesia. Studies show:

• Average delay: nearly 18 minutes
• Some delays exceed an hour
• Longer surgery = higher infection risk

Conversion to Open Surgery: Sometimes malfunctions require emergency conversion to traditional open surgery, negating the “minimally invasive” benefits and increasing complications.

The Litigation Landscape

#

Intuitive Surgical’s Litigation History

#

$67 Million Settlement (2014): Intuitive set aside $67 million to settle approximately 3,000 claims related to da Vinci injuries, some dating back to 2012. The company determined settlement was more cost-effective than continued litigation.

Current Status (2024): According to Intuitive’s SEC filings, approximately 93 active lawsuits are pending in various courts across the country. Many involve claims for:

• Monopolar Curved Scissors defects
• Instrument tip cover failures
• Failure to warn about known risks

Common Claims Against Intuitive

#

Design Defect:

• Electrosurgical instruments prone to energy leakage
• Inadequate insulation on instrument tips
• System architecture allowing uncontrolled movements

Manufacturing Defect:

• Specific instruments with substandard components
• Quality control failures in production
• Defective individual units

Failure to Warn:

• Not disclosing known instrument defects
• Inadequate warnings about energy leakage risks
• Concealing adverse event data from surgeons

Misrepresentation:

• Overstating safety compared to traditional surgery
• Marketing to surgeons with inadequate training programs
• Downplaying complication rates

Recent Verdicts and Settlements

#

Medical Malpractice Claims

#

When Surgeons Are Liable

#

Even if the da Vinci system functions properly, surgeons and hospitals may be liable for:

Inadequate Training:

• Performing procedures without sufficient robotic surgery training
• Hospital credentialing surgeons too quickly
• Learning curves at patient expense

Improper Patient Selection:

• Using robotic surgery when traditional approaches would be safer
• Not accounting for patient anatomy or conditions
• Ignoring contraindications for robotic procedures

Negligent Operation:

• Errors in controlling robotic arms
• Misinterpreting 3D visualization
• Improper use of electrosurgical instruments

Failure to Convert:

• Continuing robotic surgery when complications indicate switching to open surgery
• Pride or stubbornness overriding patient safety

Failure to Monitor:

• Not properly maintaining equipment
• Ignoring warning signs during surgery
• Inadequate post-operative monitoring

Hospital Liability

#

Hospitals may be independently liable for:

• Credentialing surgeons who lack adequate training
• Failing to maintain equipment properly
• Ignoring patterns of complications with specific surgeons or equipment
• Inadequate nursing and support staff for robotic procedures

Informed Consent Issues

#

What Patients Aren’t Told

#

Many patients report they weren’t adequately informed about:

• The surgeon’s specific experience with robotic procedures
• Complication rates for robotic vs. traditional surgery
• Known device defects or recalls
• That the “robot” doesn’t operate autonomously—it’s surgeon-controlled
• Training requirements and the learning curve
• Alternative treatment options

Strengthening Your Case

#

If you weren’t adequately informed before consenting to robotic surgery, you may have an additional claim for:

• Lack of informed consent: Failure to disclose material risks
• Battery: In some jurisdictions, inadequate consent can support battery claims
• Fraud/misrepresentation: If risks were actively concealed

Evidence Preservation

#

If You’ve Been Injured

#

Immediate Steps:

1. Request complete medical records — Operative reports, nursing notes, anesthesia records
2. Document symptoms — Keep a detailed log of complications as they develop
3. Preserve equipment — Request the hospital preserve specific instruments used in your surgery
4. Photograph injuries — Visible complications, surgical sites
5. Note timeline — When symptoms appeared, when complications were diagnosed

Critical Evidence to Request

#

Spoliation Concerns

#

Hospitals may not preserve robotic surgery evidence indefinitely. Send a preservation letter through an attorney immediately to:

• Hospital administration
• Hospital risk management
• Intuitive Surgical legal department
• Equipment service providers

Failure to preserve evidence after notice can support spoliation sanctions.

Pursuing Your Claim

#

Choosing Between Defendants

#

Many cases target multiple parties:

Intuitive Surgical (Product Liability):

• Stronger if evidence shows device defect
• Company has resources to pay substantial damages
• Pattern evidence from other cases helps

Surgeon (Malpractice):

• Stronger if evidence shows operator error
• Malpractice insurance provides coverage
• May be subject to damage caps in some states

Hospital (Malpractice/Vicarious Liability):

• Stronger if credentialing or oversight failed
• Deeper pockets than individual surgeon
• May be liable for surgeon’s negligence

Statutes of Limitations

#

Time limits vary by state and claim type:

• Medical malpractice: Often 2-3 years
• Product liability: Often 2-4 years
• Discovery rule: May extend deadline if injury wasn’t immediately apparent

Don’t delay. Statutes of limitations are strict, and evidence degrades over time.

Finding the Right Attorney

#

Look for attorneys with:

• Experience in surgical robot litigation specifically
• Medical malpractice and product liability expertise
• Resources to take on Intuitive Surgical
• Track record of verdicts and settlements
• Understanding of FDA regulatory framework

Frequently Asked Questions

#

Related Resources

#

• Surgical Robot Injuries — Industry overview
• Medical AI Liability — AI in healthcare
• AI Medical Diagnosis Liability — AI diagnostic errors
• Understanding Liability — Product liability frameworks
• Evidence Checklist — What to preserve after any injury