When Toys Harm Children#
Every three minutes, a child receives emergency room treatment for a toy-related injury. In 2023, approximately 232,000 toy-related injuries sent Americans to emergency departments—with children under 15 accounting for 72% of victims. While traditional hazards like choking, sharp edges, and toxic materials remain concerns, a new category of risk has emerged: AI-powered robotic toys that can expose children to inappropriate content, collect sensitive data, and create unpredictable interactions.
U.S. PIRG’s 2025 “Trouble in Toyland” report—the organization’s 40th annual toy safety study—included AI toys for the first time, finding that some robots and teddy bears marketed to children ages 3-12 will discuss sexually explicit topics, offer advice on finding matches or knives, and have limited or no parental controls.
The Toy Injury Landscape#
National Injury Statistics#
CPSC 2023 Data:
| Metric | Figure |
|---|---|
| Total toy-related injuries | ~232,000 |
| Children 14 and under | 72% of injuries |
| Children 12 and under | 67% of injuries |
| Children 4 and under | 36% of injuries |
| Male victims | 57% |
| Treated and released | 92% |
| Hospitalized/transferred | 6% |
| Deaths (children under 12) | 10 |
Where Injuries Occur:
- Approximately 50% of all toy-related injuries involve the head or face
- Non-motorized scooters account for one in five toy injuries to children under 15
- Other high-risk toys: balls, dolls, toy guns, water slides, inflatables
CPSC Enforcement Actions (2024)#
The Consumer Product Safety Commission’s enforcement activity reveals the scale of dangerous toys reaching consumers:
- 22 toy recalls issued for hazards including choking, fire, and toxic exposure
- 1.5 million dangerous toys seized by CPSC and Customs and Border Protection
- ~101,900 toy seizures related to lead content alone
- 498 notices of violation for toys issued through September 2025
- 129 shipments flagged for toxics (lead, phthalates)
The AI Toy Problem#
PIRG’s 2025 Findings#
U.S. PIRG Education Fund’s 40th annual “Trouble in Toyland” report raised alarm about AI-powered toys for the first time. Researchers tested four AI toys marketed to children ages 3-12:
Toys Tested:
- Kumma — AI teddy bear (FoloToy, Singapore)
- Grok — Rocket-shaped AI toy (Curio, Silicon Valley)
- Robot MINI — AI robot (Little Learners)
- Miko 3 — AI robot (Miko, India)
What PIRG Found:
These AI toys:
- Will talk in-depth about sexually explicit topics
- Will offer advice on where children can find matches or knives
- Act dismayed when children say they have to leave
- Have limited or no parental controls
- Are built on the same large language models that power adult chatbots
- Use AI systems that companies like OpenAI don’t recommend for children
- Have “well-documented issues with accuracy, inappropriate content generation and unpredictable behavior”
Immediate Impact
Privacy and Data Collection#
PIRG raised serious concerns about data collection by AI toys:
Data These Toys Collect:
- Children’s voices (recorded)
- Names and dates of birth
- Facial recognition scans
- Likes, dislikes, preferences
- Names of favorite friends
- Information about family members
According to Teresa Murray, PIRG consumer watchdog director: “All of them are collecting your child’s voices, potentially. They’re collecting their names, their dates of birth. All kinds of information — the kid’s likes, dislikes, favorite toys, favorite friends.”
Why AI Toys Are Different#
Traditional toy hazards are physical—choking risks, sharp edges, toxic materials. AI toy hazards include:
Content Risks:
- Inappropriate conversations generated by AI
- Unpredictable responses to child queries
- Potential for AI “guardrails” to fail
- Access to information children shouldn’t have
Psychological Risks:
- Emotional manipulation (“act dismayed when you say you have to leave”)
- Dependency-forming interactions
- Unknown developmental impacts
- Normalized surveillance
Privacy Risks:
- Voice recording without meaningful consent
- Biometric data collection (facial recognition)
- Data shared with AI companies
- Unknown data retention and use
As PIRG’s R.J. Cross noted: “It’s one thing to rush AI products to market to find cures for pediatric cancer. It’s another thing to rush to sell toy robots and teddy bears with chatbots in them. We don’t know what the impacts of these products will be on the first generation of kids to use them.”
Major Toy Hazard Categories#
Button Battery Dangers#
Button cell batteries are one of the most serious toy hazards, causing severe injuries and deaths when swallowed.
The Danger:
- When swallowed, button batteries can cause internal chemical burns within 2 hours
- Batteries can burn through the esophagus or stomach lining
- Injuries can be fatal or cause permanent damage
- Young children may not report swallowing a battery
2024-2025 Recalls Involving Button Batteries:
| Product | Hazard | Units |
|---|---|---|
| KTEBO Writing Tablets | Battery compartment screw doesn’t stay attached | Varies |
| Cubimana Building Sets | Battery compartment easily accessed by children | 23,000+ |
| Flashlight Toys | Button cells in easily opened compartments | Varies |
| Yoto Mini Speakers | Overheating/fire risk from batteries | 251,165 |
CPSC Warning Language: “When button cell or coin batteries are swallowed, they can cause serious injuries, internal chemical burns, and death.”
Choking Hazards#
Choking remains the leading cause of toy-related deaths.
Risk Factors:
- Small parts that can detach
- Toys designed for older children used by younger children
- Magnetic components that can be swallowed
- Spherical ends that can block airways
High-Powered Magnet Dangers: Magnet fidget spinners and similar toys pose a special risk. When multiple magnets are swallowed:
- Magnets attract each other inside the body
- Can cause intestinal perforations
- Can twist or block intestines
- Can lead to blood poisoning
- Can be fatal
Toxic Materials#
Despite regulations, toys with dangerous levels of lead and other toxics continue to reach consumers.
2024 Enforcement:
- 101,900 toy seizures for lead content violations
- 129 shipments flagged for lead or phthalates
- Products found with lead levels exceeding federal limits
- Cadmium contamination found in some products
Health Impacts of Lead Exposure:
- Developmental delays
- Learning difficulties
- Behavioral problems
- Permanent neurological damage
Aqua Dots Settlement
Family of infant who swallowed Aqua Dots beads containing harmful chemicals recovered $435,000 from manufacturer. Beads contained a chemical that metabolized into a date-rape drug when ingested, causing coma-like symptoms in children.
CSI Fingerprint Kit Litigation
Lawsuits filed against CBS and manufacturer after CSI-branded fingerprint kit found to contain asbestos. Manufacturer filed Chapter 7 bankruptcy. CBS funded customer refunds as part of settlement agreement.
Product Liability for Toy Injuries#
Who Can Be Held Liable#
Multiple parties may be responsible when a child is injured by a defective toy:
Toy Manufacturer:
- Design defects in the product
- Manufacturing defects in specific units
- Failure to warn of known hazards
- Inadequate testing before sale
Distributor:
- Selling products known to be dangerous
- Failure to pass along safety warnings
- Distributing recalled products
Retailer:
- Selling products after recall notices
- Failing to remove dangerous products
- Continuing sales despite known hazards
Online Marketplace (Amazon, Walmart, etc.):
- Liability varies by jurisdiction
- Some states hold platforms responsible
- Others treat platforms as mere conduits
- Third-party seller products create complexity
Product Liability Theories#
Design Defect:
- The toy was inherently dangerous as designed
- A safer alternative design was feasible
- The defect caused the injury
Manufacturing Defect:
- Specific unit deviated from design
- Quality control failure
- Contamination during production
Failure to Warn:
- Inadequate warnings about hazards
- Missing age-appropriateness guidance
- No instructions for safe use
- Warnings not prominent enough
Important: In many product liability claims, injured parties don’t need to prove negligence—only that the product’s unsafe quality caused injury during normal use.
For AI/Robotic Toys Specifically#
Additional Liability Theories:
Negligent Design of AI Systems:
- AI guardrails inadequate for child users
- Foreseeable that children would encounter inappropriate content
- Alternative safer designs available
Privacy Violations:
- Collecting children’s data without proper COPPA compliance
- Failure to secure collected data
- Unauthorized sharing of children’s information
Failure to Test:
- Inadequate testing of AI responses
- No testing with actual child users
- Failure to anticipate misuse scenarios
What to Do If Your Child Is Injured#
Immediate Steps#
- Seek medical attention — Even seemingly minor injuries can be serious
- Preserve the toy — Don’t throw it away, repair it, or return it
- Document the injury — Photographs of injuries and the toy
- Keep packaging — Model numbers, manufacturer info, retailer
- Save the receipt — Proof of purchase and date
- Check for recalls — Visit CPSC.gov/Recalls
- Report to CPSC — File a SaferProducts.gov report
- Contact an attorney — Before speaking with manufacturer
Evidence to Preserve#
| Evidence Type | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| The toy itself | Physical evidence of defect |
| Packaging and instructions | Warnings (or lack thereof) |
| Purchase receipt | Date of purchase, retailer |
| Medical records | Documentation of injuries |
| Photos/videos | Visual evidence |
| Witness statements | Anyone who saw the incident |
| CPSC recall notices | Prior knowledge of hazard |
| Online reviews | Pattern of similar incidents |
Reporting Requirements#
CPSC Reporting:
- File at SaferProducts.gov
- Creates official record
- May trigger investigation
- Helps protect other children
Medical Documentation:
- Ensure medical records specify the toy as cause
- Request copies of all treatment records
- Document follow-up care needed
Understanding Recalls#
How Toy Recalls Work#
The CPSC works with manufacturers to recall dangerous toys. However:
Recall Limitations:
- Recalls are often voluntary (negotiated with companies)
- Enforcement can be slow
- Not all consumers learn about recalls
- Recalled toys may still be sold (especially online)
- International sellers may ignore U.S. recalls
What Recalls Mean for Your Case#
A Recall Strengthens Your Case:
- Establishes the manufacturer knew of the hazard
- Creates official record of the defect
- May show pattern of injuries
- Can support punitive damages claims
But You Don’t Need a Recall:
- Products can be defective without being recalled
- You can sue even for non-recalled products
- Recalls often come after injuries occur
Checking for Recalls#
- CPSC Recalls: cpsc.gov/Recalls
- Sign up for alerts: cpsc.gov/Newsroom/Subscribe
- SaferProducts database: saferproducts.gov
- Manufacturer websites: Check specific brands
Online Marketplace Liability#
The Amazon/Walmart Question#
Many toy injuries involve products sold by third-party sellers on major platforms. Liability for these sales is evolving:
Arguments for Platform Liability:
- Platforms profit from sales
- Platforms control the transaction
- Platforms have resources for safety verification
- Consumers reasonably trust major platforms
Arguments Against Platform Liability:
- Platforms are intermediaries only
- Section 230 immunity arguments
- Third-party seller is the “real” seller
- Impractical to verify all products
Current State of Law: Varies significantly by state. Some states have found Amazon and similar platforms liable for defective third-party products; others have not. Check your jurisdiction.
Best Practices for Parents#
When buying toys online:
- Prefer major brands from reputable sellers
- Check seller ratings and reviews
- Look for safety certifications
- Verify age recommendations
- Search for recalls before purchase
- Inspect products upon arrival
Frequently Asked Questions#
Related Resources#
- Eldercare Robotics Liability — Care robots and patient safety
- Amazon Warehouse Injuries — Warehouse robotics liability
- Understanding Liability — Product liability frameworks
- Evidence Checklist — What to preserve after any injury
- Filing a Claim — Step-by-step claims process
Child Injured by a Defective Toy?
If your child was injured by a defective toy, recalled product, or AI-powered device with inadequate safety features, your family may have claims against the manufacturer, distributor, or retailer. Connect with product liability attorneys experienced in children's injury cases.
Get Free Consultation