↓ Skip to main content
  1. Find Attorneys by City/

Pittsburgh Robotaxi & Robot Injury Claims

Pittsburgh: Robotaxi & Robot Injury Legal Resources
#

Pittsburgh holds a unique place in autonomous vehicle history. The city has been a testing ground for self-driving technology since 2016, when Uber first deployed autonomous vehicles here. Now, with Waymo announcing expansion plans in December 2025, Pittsburgh is poised to become a major robotaxi market. Understanding your legal options is essential as this technology reaches Pittsburgh’s streets.

The Robotaxi Landscape in Pittsburgh
#

Pittsburgh’s combination of challenging driving conditions, world-class robotics research at Carnegie Mellon University, and decade-long history with autonomous vehicles makes it a natural market for robotaxi expansion.

Waymo’s Expansion Plans
#

In December 2025, Waymo announced Pittsburgh as one of 19 additional U.S. cities targeted for robotaxi service:

  • Testing with manual drivers began in Downtown Pittsburgh in December 2025
  • Plans to move to autonomous testing with safety operators in coming months
  • Goal of eventual fully autonomous robotaxi service
  • Waymo cited Pittsburgh’s AV history and Carnegie Mellon’s robotics expertise as factors in the decision

Current Regulatory Status
#

As of late 2025, no companies operate fully autonomous vehicles without a driver in Pennsylvania:

  • Waymo has not yet applied to operate fully automated vehicles in Pittsburgh
  • The company holds a certificate of compliance for operation with a driver in Philadelphia
  • Pittsburgh testing is proceeding under different authorization

Pittsburgh’s AV History
#

Pittsburgh has extensive experience with autonomous vehicle testing:

  • 2016: Uber launched autonomous vehicle testing in Pittsburgh
  • 2018: Fatal Uber autonomous vehicle crash in Arizona led to program suspension
  • Aurora, Uber’s former AV unit, has maintained Pittsburgh operations
  • Argo AI was headquartered in Pittsburgh before shutting down in 2022
  • Carnegie Mellon University remains a global leader in robotics and AV research

Pennsylvania Autonomous Vehicle Law
#

Pennsylvania has developed a regulatory framework for autonomous vehicles that differs from more permissive states like Texas or Arizona.

Testing Authorization
#

Pennsylvania requires companies to obtain authorization before testing autonomous vehicles:

  • Companies must apply to PennDOT for testing permits
  • Safety drivers may be required depending on authorization level
  • Specific route and operating condition restrictions may apply
  • Companies must carry adequate insurance

Liability Principles
#

Pennsylvania law provides several avenues for autonomous vehicle injury claims:

Product Liability: Pennsylvania follows Section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts for strict product liability. Manufacturers may be liable for:

  • Design defects in autonomous driving systems
  • Manufacturing defects in vehicle hardware
  • Failure to provide adequate warnings

Negligence: Companies may be liable for:

  • Negligent testing procedures
  • Failure to properly supervise safety operators
  • Deploying vehicles in conditions they cannot handle
  • Inadequate maintenance

Comparative Negligence: Pennsylvania uses modified comparative negligence:

  • You can recover damages if you’re less than 51% at fault
  • Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault
  • If you’re 51% or more responsible, you cannot recover

Statute of Limitations
#

In Pennsylvania, you generally have two years from the date of injury to file a personal injury lawsuit. Acting promptly is essential to preserve your rights.

Who Can Be Held Liable?
#

As robotaxi services develop in Pittsburgh, multiple parties may bear liability for injuries:

Autonomous Vehicle Companies
#

Companies like Waymo operating or testing in Pittsburgh may be liable for:

  • Defective autonomous driving systems
  • Software failures that cause accidents
  • Negligent testing practices
  • Failure to warn about system limitations

Safety Operators
#

During the testing phase with safety operators aboard:

  • Operators may be personally liable for failure to intervene
  • Their employers are likely vicariously liable for their actions
  • Inadequate training may create additional company liability

Vehicle Manufacturers
#

Companies that build the physical vehicles may be liable for:

  • Hardware defects
  • Integration failures between vehicle and autonomous systems
  • Manufacturing defects

Testing Partners
#

Companies may partner with local organizations for testing:

  • Partners may share liability for negligent testing protocols
  • Research institutions may have liability exposure
  • Third-party maintenance providers could be liable

Pittsburgh’s Unique Driving Challenges
#

Pittsburgh’s geography and infrastructure present specific challenges for autonomous vehicles:

Complex Terrain
#

Pittsburgh’s topography is famously challenging:

  • Steep hills requiring careful acceleration and braking
  • Narrow streets in older neighborhoods
  • Complex intersections where multiple roads converge
  • Bridges and tunnels creating varied driving conditions

Weather Conditions
#

Pittsburgh experiences conditions that challenge autonomous systems:

  • Heavy snow and ice during winter months
  • Rain and fog affecting sensor performance
  • Temperature extremes stressing electronic systems
  • Changing conditions that require rapid system adaptation

Road Infrastructure
#

Pittsburgh’s road network presents challenges:

  • Many roads without lane markings or with faded markings
  • Brick and cobblestone streets in some neighborhoods
  • Construction constantly changing road layouts
  • Potholes and uneven surfaces

Traffic Patterns
#

Pittsburgh’s unique traffic includes:

  • “Pittsburgh left” turning tradition
  • Complex merging patterns
  • Heavy event traffic (Steelers, Penguins, Pirates)
  • University-related traffic surges

Steps to Take After an AV Incident in Pittsburgh
#

1. Ensure Safety
#

Move out of traffic if possible. Pittsburgh’s hilly terrain and narrow streets can make roadside positions hazardous.

2. Call 911
#

Contact Pittsburgh Bureau of Police or appropriate jurisdiction for an official report.

3. Identify the Vehicle
#

Note which company operates the vehicle:

  • Look for company branding on the vehicle
  • Note whether a safety operator is present
  • Photograph the vehicle’s sensor array and identification numbers

4. Document Everything
#

  • Photograph all vehicles, damage, and the scene
  • Note the exact location (street names, landmarks, hill grade)
  • Record time, weather, and road conditions
  • Get witness contact information
  • Check for nearby security cameras or traffic cameras

5. File Reports
#

  • Police report with Pittsburgh Bureau of Police
  • Report to NHTSA (888-327-4236)
  • Consider reporting to PennDOT
  • Retain copies of all reports

6. Seek Medical Attention
#

Get evaluated promptly. Document all medical care and retain records.

7. Preserve Evidence
#

  • Save all medical records and bills
  • Document lost wages
  • Preserve any photos or videos
  • Don’t give recorded statements without legal advice

8. Consult an Attorney
#

Autonomous vehicle cases require specialized knowledge:

  • Technical understanding of AV systems
  • Experience with product liability law
  • Resources to access and analyze vehicle data
  • Understanding of Pennsylvania’s regulatory framework

Challenges Unique to Pittsburgh AV Cases
#

Testing Phase Complications
#

During Waymo’s testing phase:

  • Different liability standards may apply
  • Safety operators’ actions become central to cases
  • Testing protocols may affect liability analysis
  • Data availability may differ from commercial operations

Weather-Related Claims#

Pittsburgh’s challenging weather may affect liability:

  • Companies may argue weather contributed to incidents
  • Operating in conditions vehicles can’t handle may show negligence
  • Weather documentation becomes important evidence

CMU and Research Connections
#

Pittsburgh’s deep research ties affect the AV landscape:

  • Many companies have CMU alumni and connections
  • Research publications may be relevant to cases
  • Expert witnesses may have local affiliations
  • Innovation culture may influence jury attitudes

Historical Context
#

Pittsburgh’s long AV history provides context:

  • Previous incidents and responses may be relevant
  • Evolution of safety practices can be examined
  • Patterns of behavior by companies may emerge

Pittsburgh Resources
#

  • Pittsburgh Bureau of Police: File accident reports
  • Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas: Civil litigation venue
  • PennDOT: Pennsylvania transportation and vehicle registration
  • Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission: Utility and transportation oversight
  • NHTSA Mid-Atlantic Region: Federal vehicle safety concerns

Related Information#

This information is for educational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Pennsylvania autonomous vehicle law continues to evolve. Consult with qualified legal professionals to understand your rights in specific situations.